PQC Patents

Cryptographic patents relevant to post-quantum migration, enriched across 25 technical dimensions. For research — not legal or IP advice.

What this means for you

Executive / Business Leader
Licensing exposure is part of vendor risk: the "Top assignee" view shows who has filed the most claims over the implementations your suppliers ship.
GRC / Risk & Compliance
A patent filing is dated evidence of prior work; "Filing activity over time" shows when each family of claims was first written down.
Developer / Engineer
Filter to "Core invention" and "PQC only" to see the constructions that carry real claims before you standardise your own envelope or hybrid format.
Security Architect
Use "Map to FIPS 203/4/5" to see which patents touch the standards you are designing against; hybrid schemes have their own filter.
Researcher / Academic
The "Corpus scope" control switches between all filings and the core-invention set; each patent opens with its claims, not just its abstract.
Certification & Validation Engineer
Use "Map to FIPS 203/4/5" to see which filings touch the algorithms a module implements; licensing is a question for the vendor, not for the lab.
IT Ops / DevOps
Patents change nothing you operate today; the licensing angle you need rides on the vendors in the migration catalogue.
Curious Explorer
A patent is a public description of an invention with a date on it — this is where the post-quantum ideas were first written down, searchable by title, assignee or number.
Corpus scope
Showing patents that use post-quantum or hybrid cryptography. 17 more are quantum-safe without a PQC algorithm — AES-256, SHA-2/3 or QKD — and appear under “All crypto”.

What this means for your migration

30 of the patents below touch ML-KEM, ML-DSA, SLH-DSA — the algorithms your own path uses — and they are held by 20 organisations.

What this does not tell you: whether any of it is enforceable against you. We record assignees and claims; we do not record licensing terms, patent-pledge commitments, or any history of assertion, and we are not in a position to say whether you owe anyone anything. Treat the list below as who to ask, and put the question to your own counsel.

Who holds the most in your area

Filing activity over time

Patents by filing year

711 patents · 2013–2026
201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024202520260306090120

Crypto agility

Quantum relevance in claims

Patents by region
Quantum hardware

Top assignees

PQC algorithm coverage

Classical algorithms replaced

Application domains

Patent data sourced from USPTO. For research and education — not legal or IP advice.

Next step

See the algorithms the claims cover

The algorithms page compares the schemes these patents were filed on.